Five years ago, Andrew Joyce wrote a compelling three-part series of articles on “The Alt-Right and the Homosexual Question” (published at AltRight.com).
Great article. This is one of the many reasons jews were kicked out of Germany. I highly recommend the documentary Europa: The Last Battle to fully understand the Jewish Question.
Thank you, Michael, I appreciate the kind words. And yes, I hope that all of us can help each other with promoting articles and ideas that help our people to arrive at the truth. Thanks again.
It's not anal "sex". The correct term is buggery. Homosexuals do not engage in sex. Sex is copulation between male and female. Homosexuals, by definition, can not engage in "sex". The distortion of the meaning of words and language is (imo) one of (((their))) most dangerous weapons. It is chaos and destruction to rational discussion. Without clear and defined communication we are truly lost. Be vigilant of the words you use and the meaning they convey. Do not fall into the trap of using (((their))) language.
Sorry, but it's not "their" language. "They" don't own it. The meaning of any word or expression is always determined by its context and usage of the author. Jews don't have a monopoly on the term "sex" as much as they might want to think they do. Thus, I used the term anal "sex" or homosexual "sex" in its most basic sense - namely, to denote sexual relations between males without getting into all the particulars of it.
You may not consider homosexual sex 'natural sex' - and neither do I - but it is still sex in some form whether we like it or not because it involves the sex organs, involves sexual arousal, and its purpose is sexual gratification.
I didn't use such inflammatory expressions as "buggery" or "faggotry" or whatever because the aim of my article was not to unnecessarily inflame my readers by the use of crude language or epithets, etc. Your argument is akin to someone urging me to not use the term "homosexual," but instead to refer to them as "faggots" or "sodomites," etc. This will get us nowhere - that is, if our intention is to inform and educate and to hopefully get others to consider our position.
Great article. This is one of the many reasons jews were kicked out of Germany. I highly recommend the documentary Europa: The Last Battle to fully understand the Jewish Question.
Hi Ambrose. This is Michael. You had commented on my article about my awakening to the Jewish question (https://thejews.substack.com/p/my-awakening-to-the-jewish-question) , and I have had a few readers come to my site on your recommendation. Thanks for that!
I also wanted to tell you that this article of yours is the best thing I've read on the homosexual question. Thanks for this too.
I wish you luck with your substack. I see that you have a lot to say that needs to be heard.
All the best, and keep up the fight.
Michael
Thank you, Michael, I appreciate the kind words. And yes, I hope that all of us can help each other with promoting articles and ideas that help our people to arrive at the truth. Thanks again.
It's not anal "sex". The correct term is buggery. Homosexuals do not engage in sex. Sex is copulation between male and female. Homosexuals, by definition, can not engage in "sex". The distortion of the meaning of words and language is (imo) one of (((their))) most dangerous weapons. It is chaos and destruction to rational discussion. Without clear and defined communication we are truly lost. Be vigilant of the words you use and the meaning they convey. Do not fall into the trap of using (((their))) language.
Sorry, but it's not "their" language. "They" don't own it. The meaning of any word or expression is always determined by its context and usage of the author. Jews don't have a monopoly on the term "sex" as much as they might want to think they do. Thus, I used the term anal "sex" or homosexual "sex" in its most basic sense - namely, to denote sexual relations between males without getting into all the particulars of it.
You may not consider homosexual sex 'natural sex' - and neither do I - but it is still sex in some form whether we like it or not because it involves the sex organs, involves sexual arousal, and its purpose is sexual gratification.
I didn't use such inflammatory expressions as "buggery" or "faggotry" or whatever because the aim of my article was not to unnecessarily inflame my readers by the use of crude language or epithets, etc. Your argument is akin to someone urging me to not use the term "homosexual," but instead to refer to them as "faggots" or "sodomites," etc. This will get us nowhere - that is, if our intention is to inform and educate and to hopefully get others to consider our position.